There are certain considerations that everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the issue of how to deal with situation when professor or leader makes a mistake in a speech. Someone contends correcting the mistakes right away is unreasonable since it would disturb both the classroom and meetings’ discipline and the speakers’ plans. However, I believe that immediate correction is the most beneficial thing to do, for not only can it provides accurate information right way, but also is essential for comprehending the whole speech.
First and foremost, correcting the mistakes right away let all the audiences know the accurate concept immediately, contributing to a better comprehension to what the speaker is talking about. For instance, if a student points out a wrong thing the professor mentioned, all the classmates will notice it. Otherwise, the professor can only correct it during the next lecture, which means some students may have forgotten about the concept or even have absorbed the wrong idea! It is vividly clear that it is not good for students' learning.
Furthermore, the coherence between different information is another noticeable factor. Bearing something wrong in mind is likely to affect the understanding of knowledge after that. Let's imaging the situation of a math teacher giving students a wrong formula accidentally. If this mistake is not pointed out, it will be impossible for the students to complete all the exercises related to that in the lecture, and even cannot understand other theories based on this formula.
Finally, an additional support come into my mind is that speakers should encourage other people to correct his mistakes right away, which contributes to a more freedom atmosphere. No one can deny the fact that with the rapid trend towards modernization, more and more people now want to express themselves freely, which is also good for spurring spirit and encouraging innovation. Whether it is in a university, institute or enterprise, a free environment will absolutely have some profits. Hence, teachers or managers, as a leader of a group, should provide opportunities for everyone to talk freely and equally.
Due to the aforementioned ground, while someone may have their own justification to argue that interrupting speakers to correct them is not polite, I still asserts that it is proper and beneficial to do so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'assert'
Suggestion: assert
... to correct them is not polite, I still asserts that it is proper and beneficial to do ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, still, while, for instance, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31151832461 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06014224282 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575916230366 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7888876237 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.266666667 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4666666667 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161762179523 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509242709023 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040702481849 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854677949711 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387734098212 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.