TPO 45
The reading states that the found structures were not created by bees and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it is possible that the structures were made by bees and refutes each of the author's unconvincing point.
First, the reading claims that no fossil remains of bees have been found that date to 200 million years ago. The professor refutes this point by saying that it is true that there is no fossil, which date back to 200 million years ago, but it does not mean bees were not exist those days. Fossils preserve under certain condition, which one of them is sticky liquid made by trees. Such trees are very rare and it is probable that these kinds of trees did not exist 200 million years ago. So, no fossil of bees could have been preserved.
Second, the article explains that absence of flowering plants is another reason, because bees usually feed on flowering plants. However, the professor contends that those bees may feed on non-flowering plants, for example, Feren and Pine trees. When these plants evolved, bees gradually adopted to new plant.
Third, the reading averts that details of found structures is not similar to those of modern ones. The lecture apposes this point by stating that modern bees use some certain kinds of chemical to protect their nest. Analyzing of the found structures has revealed that the chemical substance of the found structures is the same as that of the modern bee nests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ago, but it does not mean bees were not exist those days. Fossils preserve under cert...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, so, third, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 250.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25411268574 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 618.680645161 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3490577678 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8461538462 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.