tpo43
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
-Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Todays, it is very important for the people to have a well and suitable communication. One of the most important times which we should have a well relation and discussion is when we are talking to a professor, because of their high rank in the society. While most of the people think that when a teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in their opinion, they should interrupt the lecture and correct the mistake right away, personally I believe that it is not a good idea. I think the best reaction is wait until the professor finish the lecture and then talk to him/her about the mistake. The reasons for my choice are manifold, among which respectful and prevent a contestation are most paramount ones.
First, I believe that all the people have respectful; however, the professors and teachers have a high rank in the society and it is very important to respect to them. If anybody argue with them in public, they would not respect to them. Consequently, the best way to correct their mistake is say that in private.
Additionally, I think sometimes if anybody interrupt a lecture and say something againts of the lecturer make him/her angry and maybe cause a contestation between them. Also, if we do not say their mistake it can suffer ourselves that somebody are wrong and spread it to all the society. Thus, it is better to say the mistake in private to prevent a contestation and harm ourselves. As a personal experiment, I was in a religious meeting three years ago. There was a leader in the meeting who was speak about history of Islam. I heard something which I was sure it was wrong. I interrupt his speak and said his mistake in front of all the people. He get angry and made his sound loud then argue with me. It was not a good experiment.
As a conclusion, personally I believe that we should talk about mistakes in private for reasons including respectful and prevent a contestation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Todays, it is very important for the peo...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...contestation are most paramount ones. First, I believe that all the people hav...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their mistake is say that in private. Additionally, I think sometimes if anybo...
^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'think'.
Suggestion: sometimes think
...y that in private. Additionally, I think sometimes if anybody interrupt a lecture and say ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spoke', 'spoken'.
Suggestion: spoke; spoken
...ere was a leader in the meeting who was speak about history of Islam. I heard somethi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
... mistake in front of all the people. He get angry and made his sound loud then argu...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith me. It was not a good experiment. As a conclusion, personally I believe th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66076696165 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71226386052 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448377581121 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4163890382 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210638140528 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06270642356 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730435178701 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110112904292 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634010442261 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.