In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today
Over the past several decades, our society has witnessed and experienced radical changes in each and every aspect of our lives. One of the most salient transformations that can be seen in society is the increasing number of cars in use. Regarding this issue, some people hold the opinion that people will utilize fewer cars in the future primarily because of the pollutants emitted by them. Personally, however, I believe that in twenty years there will be even more automobiles in use than there presently are. I feel this way mainly because of two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
In the first place, it is my point of view that urban cities are augmenting in size and that more rural areas are morphing into advanced towns. As a result, as time passes by, people who have to commute, are using more cars than ever before. South Korea is a compelling example of this. Just a century ago, South Korea was an undeveloped country that based its economy mainly on agriculture. Therefore, most people did not have to travel far distances to work as they had their agricultural lands near their residencies. To be more precise, they mostly walked to their lands or traveled by bicycle. Nevertheless, Korea in the last years has experienced unprecedented growth in its economy and as a consequence, urban cities have developed in most of the city's territories. Modern people thus, usually live in places far from their companies, and inevitably have to utilize cars to commute. In other words, because the advancement of big cities encourages people to travel by car, in two decades, more cars will be in use than there are today.
In the second place, it is an undeniable fact that cars are becoming more accessible as the years go on. To explain, new laws have stimulated the increase in worker's salaries and on account of this, automobiles nowadays, are getting affordable to everyone, including people from lower social ranks. To illustrate this point, I will give a personal example. Even though my parents had an average income in the past, my family had never owned a car until a few years ago. Both my father and mother have the same job that they did when I was young, but the only difference is that their salaries have increased over the years. Now, my family owns two cars and we will probably invest our savings in one more. Stated differently, the rise in people's wages have enabled Millenials to purchase and utilize cars. It is my opinion that this phenomenon will continue and thus, more cars will be in use in twenty years' time.
To conclude, although some people may uphold that people will utilize more public transportation in the future due to car's disadvantages, I strongly believe that social and political changes will encourage more people to acquire automobiles. Therefore, based on the arguments mentioned above, I completely disagree with the statement that in two decades there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: augmenting
... my point of view that urban cities are augmenting in size and that more rural areas are morphing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, i feel, as a result, in other words, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85490196078 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64357068652 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501960784314 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.949825378 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.166666667 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37140596943 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109173020841 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132193102459 0.0737576698707 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255271092217 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583375529992 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.