vVav
Nowadays, it is critically important to be aware of mistakes. Some people prefer to mention all problems during meetings that made by people: meanwhile, others think that it is better to discuss fallacy afterwards. In my opinion, people should wait until the meeting over and then talk to the leader about incorrect information that is presented during the event. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, arguments can be solved efficiently after the lessons because we may explain all the details properly to the teacher. On the other hand, it would be quite hard to mention everything appropriately to them due to deficiency of time. For instance, last year, I was noticing that my math teacher was explaining some equalities to students wrongly which caused their failure during the exams. Although I was not listening to him and making my own calculations, once, I really got distracted from these movements and decided to talk with him. Basically, we went to a cafe and there I went into a ton of detail about his incorrect lessons and he understood me. After my description, he tried to do his best in the classes.
Secondly, in this century, one of the essential factors of relationship comes from respect. In fact, almost all sides of life require this mental skill and if we do not have, we can face some serious problems. As I mentioned in the last sentence, if we do not esteem to teachers and tell every problem to their face without respecting, our connection may be disrupted. My personal experience is a compelling example of this evidence. Approximately three years ago, I was enrolling in some classes which were affiliated with engineering. There I was having some conflicts with all teachers because every lesson, I was interrupting their speeches and correcting all the mistakes. In reality, every exam I was getting low scores, even my classmates were lower than me in studying. I recognized that all the problems originated from my unrespectful movements and changed my behavior in a good way. After a long time, I got better grades due to my huge respect for him. This example demonstrates how interrupting teacher during the lesson might cause some strict problems.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is better to discuss fallacious information after the lessons or meetings end. This is because we can properly explain all the aspects to them and because this method can improve our respect in their point of view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, it is critically important to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. First of all, arguments can be solved ef...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e tried to do his best in the classes. Secondly, in this century, one of the es...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sson might cause some strict problems. In conclusion, I firmly believe that it ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90117647059 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80088962634 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538823529412 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8773901608 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6818181818 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86363636364 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.