working for big or small companies
Some big companies nowadays are international foundations, they cross the boarders to have branches in different countries, and they hire thousands of employees from different regions with different walks in life. In my opinion, it is better to work for a big company than to work for a small one. I hold this opinion for two main reasons.
First of all, you can guarantee more benefits when you work for such big establishments, like: health insurance, life insurance, paid days off and other retirement and legal benefits. These benefits are important to workers as it makes them feel safe and satisfied. In addition, legal department will preserve your rights. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I have been working in a large institution four years ago, and one day I discovered that I were working for less than I should to be paid, it was a complicated scenario, but I talked with the human resources department and after thorough investigations they paid me back what I should to be paid for the past years. For this I prefer to work for large companies.
Secondly, it is advantageous to add this kind of big companies in your resume. In case you were interested to find another position with another employer, it will be easier if you had been working in a popular and trusted place than in unknown small firm. For instance names like google, facebook, ebay and amazon will have undoubtedly positive influence on your resume if you have been lucky to work for them .
Finally, working in a place having multicultural perspectives is a good thing. You learn different languages and cultures. Furthermore, you can also travel to different regions. I think it is a good chance for anyone to break this boring style of life by meeting and dealing with new people, and seeing new different aspects of life.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that working for big foundations is preferable over working for small companies, not only because of the financial benefits but rather than for the interesting nice working atmosphere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this opinion for two main reasons. First of all, you can guarantee more ben...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...d scenario, but I talked with the human resources department and after thorough investiga...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... prefer to work for large companies. Secondly, it is advantageous to add this...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... if you have been lucky to work for them . Finally, working in a place...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have been lucky to work for them . Finally, working in a place having multi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing new different aspects of life. In conclusion, I strongly believe that w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93948126801 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8576975803 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559077809798 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.9274793736 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.823529412 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460761481554 0.236089414692 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146064535366 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177904166049 0.0737576698707 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289887723508 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142012508896 0.0645574589148 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.