to-44- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture both talks about the European silver coin which was for the eleventh century and discovered in the United States. The reading suggests that the coin is fake and it cannot be a genuine piece of historical evidence and get three reasons for this opinion; however, the lecture states that it can be a silver European silver coin and reject the three reasons.
First, they discuss about the distance between Europe and the United States. The author claims that the distance is very far from each other, so it cannot be possible that the coin was historical. The speaker, on the other hand, says that many other objects found in the location which came from the Europe, thus the distance cannot be a good reason.
Secondly, the reading and lecture talk about existence of other coins. The writer argues that no other coin have been found in that location. In contrast, the professor states that maybe the people got back the other coins to Europe.
Finally, the essay suggests that the person who travel to North America would have known that the silver coin was useless in the United States. Nevertheless, the lecturer says that he/she can take it because of its beauty. As an example, it could be use in necklesses.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, as for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77674418605 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21560423119 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53023255814 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9662296903 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3636363636 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0672958042242 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028024870913 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235496541382 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0402429545355 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187009417749 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.