Apparently, there has been a debate about the advantage of the growing of genetically modified trees,
Apparently, there has been a debate about the advantage of the growing of genetically modified trees, A group of scientists holds the belief that there are many benefits for the environment and the farmers, from planting genetically modified trees, as the reading passage illustrate, while, another group of scientists refutes all these benefits and give many disadvantages, as the professor in the lecture does.
First of all, the lecture claims that the naturally growing trees are diverse in their properties, so that would give them the strength to cope the environmental challenges, for example, if some trees died because of insects, other trees would survive because they have natural defence against insects, also, if other trees had died because some environmental crises, other will survive as they can protect themselves from this factor, then, if we use the genetic modification that would make all the trees with the same properties, to state it more clearly, one factor may lead to wiping out all the trees as they are exactly the same. By this point, the lecturer cast the doubt regarding the reading passage point about the increase in the survival rate among trees if we used the genetically modified tree.
Second, the lecture maintains an opposite side of view about the increase of farmers income if they used the genetically modified trees, he says, to used this trees, the farmers have to buy the seeds from the company which is responsible for this modification, and for sure, they are much expensive, in addition to that, they have to buy the seeds each time they want to grow up another tree, under the law it is in legal to do that by themselves. So that would not lead to decrease the cost as the author assumes in the reading passage.
Finally, the professor contends that the using of the genetically modified trees would have a bad impact on other trees in the same area, and can cause more damage to the environment. The genetically modified tree are growing aggressively and in fast rate rather than the natural trees, so they would compete with the natural occurring tree for the resources, like water and sunlight, as a result, that would have a bad impact on the natural trees, so that would negate the reading passage claiming about the benefits to the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as the professor in the lecture does. First of all, the lecture claims that th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...we used the genetically modified tree. Second, the lecture maintains an opposit...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...author assumes in the reading passage. Finally, the professor contends that the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, finally, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, while, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 390.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91025641026 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60014286767 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453846153846 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 419.366225166 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 1.25165562914 719% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 55.0 21.2450331126 259% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 176.952662873 49.2860985944 359% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 273.571428571 110.228320801 248% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 55.7142857143 21.698381199 257% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.5714285714 7.06452816374 263% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25481992725 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134491875217 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129414602987 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193407929892 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137225518061 0.0443174109184 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.6 13.3589403974 222% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 53.8541721854 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.6 11.0289183223 214% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.09 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 10.7273730684 270% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.0 10.498013245 229% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.2008830022 214% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.