Apparently, there has been a debate about the effect of increasing in human population and agriculture on the bird population in the United State, and how this effect would be increased in the future. A group of scientists believes of this statement, which representing by the author in the reading passage, while another group of researchers completely disagrees with this theory, indeed the professor in the lecture is one of them, so he argues each point that has been mentioned in the passage.
Apparently, there has been a debate about the effect of increasing in human population and agriculture on the bird population in the United State, and how this effect would be increased in the future. A group of scientists believes of this statement, which representing by the author in the reading passage, while another group of researchers completely disagrees with this theory, indeed the professor in the lecture is one of them, so he argues each point that has been mentioned in the passage.
First of all, the professor claims that the increase population lead to disruptive bird's habitat to some extent, but that not true for all the bird types, as the author assumed, actually some bird type are increasing in the city because the city provide a good habitat for them with a plenty of food resources, for example, the hook which feeding on the rodent and bings, basically, the professor explanation knock down the reading assumption regarding the decrease in all bird types.
Second, the professor contend that the author claiming about the increase in the area of agriculture in the future, is actually not make sense because the progress in the agriculture techniques recently enable the farmer to grow different type of crops in the same area, in addition, to the increase the number of crop per land unit. Deffenetly the professor successfully opposes the second point that had been made by the text.
Finally, the professor talks about the new approaches to decrease the use of pesticides, first, using of pesticides less toxic to the animal, second, growing plants that already resistant to infection so that lead to reducing the use of pesticides. Indeed, the professor says that the author assumption may be true in the past but with all the progress in agriculture and all the awareness about the influence of pesticides on nature, there are no need to b worry anymore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Apparently, there has been a debate abou...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat has been mentioned in the passage. First of all, the professor claims that ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arding the decrease in all bird types. Second, the professor contend that the a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... point that had been made by the text. Finally, the professor talks about the n...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, finally, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, while, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96529968454 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70184440338 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507886435331 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 21.2450331126 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.750944609 49.2860985944 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 224.857142857 110.228320801 204% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.2857142857 21.698381199 209% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 17.1428571429 7.06452816374 243% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378760039111 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193588457144 0.0996497079465 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.27259041845 0.0662205650399 412% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230597460141 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.238864463851 0.0443174109184 539% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.6 13.3589403974 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.8541721854 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 11.0289183223 189% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.498013245 191% => OK
text_standard: 25.0 11.2008830022 223% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.