decreasing population of yellow cedar trees
The reading and the lecture both deal with a decrease of yellow cedar population. The author of the reading believes that three hypothesis to decline of yellow cedars. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author. He thinks that these explanations are not convincing for decreasing of yellow cedar trees.
First of all, the author points out that insect parasite may cause to decrease yellow cedars. In fact, Beetles are particularly responsible for reducing trees. It is mentioned that beetles larva eat the wood of yellow cedars. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that healthy cedars are resistant, and they secrets some poisonous chemical materials which protect them against of beetles. Furthermore, he argues that beetles attack sick and damaged cedars.
Secondly, the author contends that brown bears cause to reduce the population of yellow cedars. The article notes that beers claw at trees for finding sugar sources, so they led to weakening yellow cedars. In contrast, the lecturer disputes this point and clarifies the fact that beers are not responsible for decreasing yellow cedars. He elaborates on this by mentioning that a decrease of cedars trees are in islands which there are no beers, so reducing the population of yellow cedars are not related to beers.
Finally, the author states that climate change affects the root system of trees. The article establishes that these roots are sensitive and they suffer by this fluctuation climate. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that reducing yellow cedars is seen in both low and high elevations. He puts forth the idea that climate changes do not affect the system of roots’ trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: decreasing
...ints out that insect parasite may cause to decrease yellow cedars. In fact, Beetles are par...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
... author contends that brown bears cause to reduce the population of yellow cedars. The ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15884476534 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52835965325 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512635379061 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3516428258 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3888888889 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3888888889 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378138762817 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111801456131 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12339997941 0.0662205650399 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229554646754 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141747044312 0.0443174109184 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.