Dinsours through the fossil reading
The reading avers that the dinosaur are kind of endothermic animals so they can keep their bodies temperatures constant. In doubt cast to the narrator which saying that the dinosaur are not belong to the endothermic as well. Because dinosaur were reptiles and the reptiles are not endothermic. But in fact the dinosaur have several different ways from the reptiles so they considered endotherm.
First of all the reading passage explain that the dinosaur fossil discovered in polar regions so, that’s mean the only animals can stand this cold climate and keep their bodies temperature above the surrounding environment temperature are endotherms. In contrast to the narrator which claimed that many scientists argued about this and doesn't proof that they are endothermic because the polar region was warmer than today and even if it was cold the dinsours couldn't migrate to warmer areas or hyphenated like many reptiles do so they aren't considered endotherms.
Secondly, the strong suggestion that the dinsours were endotherms was the leg position and movement. In the reading poses that the main reason that the dinsour can run is the leg under the body not to the side of the body like in crocodile and lizards. Moreover the narrator claim that the leg position is for supporting the body weight of the dinsours and that’s one of the important issue for this kind of animals to have reasonable big body shape.
Thirdly, another claim that the dinsours were endotherm was the haversian canal which connected between endothermic and bony structure. Furthermore this canal allow the rapid growth of bone beside it contain the nerves and the blood vessels. Despite of that, the narrator agreed that the bone had the haverisan canal but bone growth rings responsible for the thickness so it either stop or slowing the cooling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
... which saying that the dinosaur are not belong to the endothermic as well. Because di...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...long to the endothermic as well. Because dinosaur were reptiles and the reptiles ...
^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...othermic. But in fact the dinosaur have several different ways from the reptiles so they consider...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...herms. In contrast to the narrator which claimed that many scientists argued abou...
^^
Line 2, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t many scientists argued about this and doesnt proof that they are endothermic because...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 465, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ay and even if it was cold the dinsours couldnt migrate to warmer areas or hyphenated l...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...yphenated like many reptiles do so they arent considered endotherms. Secondly, the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...the body like in crocodile and lizards. Moreover the narrator claim that the leg positio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...between endothermic and bony structure. Furthermore this canal allow the rapid growth of bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in contrast, in fact, kind of, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12292358804 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61285067782 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495016611296 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.22562748 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131486262249 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477207655436 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475708084913 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764804433712 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445875126572 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.