Endangered species
The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to governing laws for endangered species and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it is very important to save species from extinction and opposes each of the authors reasons.
First, the reading passage discusses that it is misbelief that by extinction of any species there will be ecosystem disaster. The author provides an example of dinosaur lead to arrival of new species and no disaster. In contrast, the professor provides information that after dinosaur extinction there was surprising shift of species domination on earth surface. So, now it is us we human beings and it is our duty to maintain ecosystem by maintaining lives of other species in turn to maintain our own life. Clearly a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that ecosystem plays an important role for human life.
Second, the article pushes forth the idea that animals have less importance in medicinal field as genetic engineering has advanced in medicine preparations. However, the classroom contends that by nature many medicines are still prepared. According to professor, 40% of prescribed drugs are prepared from plants and as 100’s of species dies per day so if any extinction occurs then there will be less chances for the arrival of new drugs into market. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in reading is unsubstantiated and as the professor said it is important to save endangering species for medical field.
Finally, the reading posits that to save endangering species huge amount of money is used which is nothing, just a waste. The author gives an example of California condor and money used to save them from getting extinct as they lived on mammoth and mammoth was no more into existence. The professor refutes this point by explaining that saving any species from getting extinct is economical advantage nor waste of money. Professor gives an example of fresh water muscles in which 43% of them are in danger of extinction in north America so as many industries are depending on that so it is obvious to save them for economical benefit. Also, he says that around 10,000 industries are depending on such animal species and average of 700 dollars of USA economy depends on them. So, this deserves and financial use for their preservation in the society.
In summary, while both the reading passage and classroom discussion provide interesting information with regards to endangered species, a significant amount of evidence supports that it is important to preserve animal species from getting extinct to maintain ecosystem. Therefore, the reading fails to justify the claims towards flaws in laws for endangered species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ny extinction occurs then there will be less chances for the arrival of new drugs in...
^^^^
Line 7, column 560, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... in north America so as many industries are depending on that so it is obvious to save them f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 680, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
..., he says that around 10,000 industries are depending on such animal species and average of 7...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s flaws in laws for endangered species.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, while, in contrast, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 30.3222958057 214% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 1373.03311258 172% => OK
No of words: 455.0 270.72406181 168% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19340659341 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.04702891845 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79057706791 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 145.348785872 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498901098901 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.0 419.366225166 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8333902161 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.15 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 4.33554083885 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294480874258 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978539792655 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915475785932 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198035462469 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05680633505 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 63.6247240618 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.