Essay topics: TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task
In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent)of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option.
The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring morestaff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits. For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate.
Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure activities.
The article states that offering four-day jobs instead of five day jobs could help economy, companies and employees who accept this offering by providing some reasons of support while the professor dispute with this by explaining how this offering adversely affect the economy, companies and also the employees.
First the reading claims that if companies offer a 4 day work week job and some employees accept it, because the employees would be more alert and relaxed, their performance improves and their errors will be decreased without extra payroll, the lecturer opposes this idea by saying that shifting to 4 day work weeks and hiring new staff in order to compensate that imposes high costs to companies for new employees’ training and medical same as a five day employee plus the expenses for new offices and computers for them.
Second the reading asserts that this offering helps economy by providing new jobs however the professor disagrees and says hiring new staff imposes high costs to companies so many companies go for other solutions such as asking employees to work more may be equal to a five day employees which not only does not provide new jobs but also make available jobs more unpleasant.
Third the reading states that this strategy will improve employees’ life quality by providing more free time for them that they could spend this time with families or on entertainments. The professor again disagrees and believes that this change will threaten the employees and make them risk of losing job because in an economic downturn they are first who will be released. Also they will lose chance of promotions because companies prefer people who has more presence to ensure continues progress of works
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that offering four-da...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, companies and also the employees. First the reading claims that if compani...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... new offices and computers for them. Second the reading asserts that this off...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...make available jobs more unpleasant. Third the reading states that this strat...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rn they are first who will be released. Also they will lose chance of promotions bec...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'while', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.292358803987 0.261695866417 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.159468438538 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0863787375415 0.0723426182421 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0431893687708 0.0435111971325 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0299003322259 0.0277247811725 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116279069767 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0431893687708 0.0370669169778 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56544742059 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0232558139535 0.0208969081088 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.093023255814 0.128158765124 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0299003322259 0.0158828679856 188% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0166112956811 0.0114777025283 145% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1759.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 285.0 271.125827815 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17192982456 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.354385964912 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291228070175 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210526315789 0.187439937562 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129824561404 0.113142543107 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56544742059 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 52.5542632119 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 47.5 21.7502111507 218% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 134.425526676 49.3711431718 272% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 293.166666667 132.220823453 222% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.5 21.7502111507 218% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 0.878197800319 209% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 76.6228070175 50.5018328374 152% => OK
Elegance: 1.94285714286 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.5704135809 0.549887131256 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.224871536483 0.142949733639 157% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105043119655 0.0787303798458 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.79145263874 0.631733273073 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.217565743621 0.139662658121 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.297941894336 0.266732575781 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117798638493 0.103435571967 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.300426628146 0.414875509568 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0814381753827 0.0530846634433 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376542306251 0.40443939384 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768591849653 0.0528353158467 145% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.