frogs
The professor discusses three main drawbacks of the solutions presented in the reading passage. The information she presents is in direct contrast to the facts outlined in the reading.
First the lecturer mentions that decreasing the use of pesticides not only suggests a practical solution, but also it puts farmers of that area in risk. Because lowering the use of pesticides will decrease farmers opportunity in today's competitive market. However, according to the reading limiting the use of pesticides have an important role in decreasing the harmful effect of pesticides on frogs.
Second, the speaker specifies that the using suggested treatment on frogs is not reasonable. In fact, she notes that these treatments need to be applied on each frog individually in order to be effective. In addition, she states that to have a long term positive effect these treatments should be used for every new generation of that frogs. On the other hand, the reading explains that for avoiding the negative effect of fungus on frogs the treatments need to be applied on frogs. According to the reading these treatments are considered to have a positive result.
Third, the professor points out that the main threat for the environment is the global warming which increase the extinction of different species of animals. In contrast, the reading notes that human activities such as inaccurate use of water resources is an important factor in putting the environment in danger. As a result, frogs would encounter many problems for laying their eggs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o it puts farmers of that area in risk. Because lowering the use of pesticides will dec...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...als. In contrast, the reading notes that human activities such as inaccurate use ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, in addition, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.204 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80778631666 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6715750654 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.076923077 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153648960006 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659972157389 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1006210567 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745713839978 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807117237887 0.0443174109184 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.