ghaghonn
The professor disagrees with the notion in the text about three methods regarding resolve the problem of reduction of frog populations. She brings several reasons to support her idea.
First, the lecturer mentions that prohibiting farmers from using pesticide is not an economical plan since they cannot provide notable production. In addition, this plan is not fair because some farmers in other lands can use pesticide but other farmers cannot therefore the latter groups of farmers are not able to produce more crops. In contrast, the reading specifies that using pesticide is harmful for frogs so if farmers do not use pesticide, the number of frogs will not decrease.
Second, the speaker clarifies that preventing infection by some treatments like antifungal medication will not be useful because we should capture each frogs then try to treat them as a result it takes too long. Besides, we just can treat the adult frogs and we are not able to treat off springs hence we will see the infection in next generation again. However, the article states that by using special treatments we are able to kill the fungus thus we are able to preserve frogs population from infection.
Finally, the instructor hints that human activities are not a major factor for reduction of frog’s population. Actually, she believes that global warming is the most significant problems that devastated the habitat of frogs therefore the number of frogs have reduced. On the other hand, according to the reading, human activities have destroyed the frogs habitat thereby the number of frogs have decreased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...ng, human activities have destroyed the frogs habitat thereby the number of frogs hav...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17692307692 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60772634423 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580769230769 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4025631586 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.363636364 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7272727273 7.06452816374 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.