By making it easier and quicker to complete international trade and financial transactions, technological advances have led to globalization the integration of economies and societies around the world. Even critics of globalization acknowledge its positive effects. One of the benefits of a global market is that it offers greater opportunity for people to tap into more and larger markets around the world. This increased market access increases the flow of capital across borders, results in cheaper imports, and also promotes competition among worldwide providers of goods and services, thus leading to greater efficiencies worldwide, since specialization allows people and economies to focus on what they do best. Another advantage of globalization is the rapid spread of knowledge and technology. Direct foreign investment results not only in capital expansion, but also in technical innovation. Knowledge about production methods, management techniques, export markets and economic policies is made available to workers in expanding markets, often in developing countries, who can in turn use this knowledge to expand and improve local businesses. Finally, in a global market, there is a tendency for workers to move from developing countries to developed countries to find better employment opportunities. This means that there is also the potential for newly learned skills to be transferred back to the developing countries from which the workers came, and for wages in these countries to rise. As wages rise and workers become more educated, developing countries experience economic growth, a reduction in poverty, and an increase in consumption, thereby leading to greater economic opportunities for all.
The article is about the positive effects of globalization. The article claims that its effects have been largely positive and provides three reasons for support. The lecture refutes those claims stating the effects of globalization is negative on the people.
First, the article claims that globalization offers more opportunity for people to tap into the growing markets around the world. The lecture while acknowledging to this effect points out that this has caused widening gap between the poor and rich countries. The rich countries have grown 6 folds while the poor countries have only grown 3 folds. The lecture claims that even the richest countries have their doubts on the positive effects of globalization.
Second, the article states that globalaization causes rapid spread of knowledge both technical and it fields of production. However, the lecture from the professor claims that even though there is increase in knowledge, there is often large downsizing in the company. The jobs from the company are moved to the developing world where the cost of production is cheaper because of lower wages. This results in increasing the divide between the rich and the poor in the developed country.
Finally, the article posits that movement of workers back from the developed world to their own countries with the skills they learned leads to increase in consumption and greater economic opportunities for everyone. However, the lecture states that this has lead to the fear that a dominant culture will supplant their own culture. Countries from China to France to Middle East are worried that a global culture will take over their own culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...and provides three reasons for support. The lecture refutes those claims stating th...
^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...poor countries have only grown 3 folds. The lecture claims that even the richest co...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269230769231 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.13986013986 0.158904122519 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0909090909091 0.0723426182421 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.034965034965 0.0435111971325 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0244755244755 0.0277247811725 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.146853146853 0.128828473217 114% => OK
Participles: 0.041958041958 0.0370669169778 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63694672745 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027972027972 0.0208969081088 134% => OK
Particles: 0.00699300699301 0.00154638098197 452% => OK
Determiners: 0.143356643357 0.128158765124 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00699300699301 0.0158828679856 44% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0034965034965 0.0114777025283 30% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1668.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 266.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27067669173 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.413533834586 0.374372842146 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.308270676692 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176691729323 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101503759398 0.113142543107 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63694672745 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522556390977 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 50.7750397172 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2046661097 49.3711431718 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 132.220823453 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.428571428571 0.878197800319 49% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 49.8270676692 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.29824561404 1.90840788429 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336385381042 0.549887131256 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.19173829189 0.142949733639 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.082826632575 0.0787303798458 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.663779454067 0.631733273073 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0677201261789 0.139662658121 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167705822219 0.266732575781 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563801825146 0.103435571967 55% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.463251615509 0.414875509568 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0706878122387 0.0530846634433 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248872803183 0.40443939384 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353109372448 0.0528353158467 67% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.