Productivity and Rewards
An important management principle is that when behavior is rewarded, it tends to be repeated. It follows that in many business enterprises, the approach to getting employees to work hard or improve productivity is to reward them with money or company stock. In addition, some enterprises use other forms of compensation such as special privileges or perhaps promotion or job reassignments or even company-paid luxury vacations and other bonuses in kind. All such rewards are usually tied in to some index of performance, which precisely calculates the relative amount of increased productivity.
Whatever the type of reward given, managerial consultants point out that the promise of such incentives improves employee attitudes, motivation, and productivity. Typical business handbooks describing compensation methods advocate giving the greatest rewards to those who perform the best. For example, a well-known academic text on incentives points out that "the closer the link between job performance and rewards, the greater the motivational effect."
Advocates of improving productivity through rewards tacitly accept that people are rather like physical bodies that require the application of some external motivating force to be set in motion. Furthermore, they argue that any such incentives must have a high perceived value to the employee and must also be perceived as within the reach of that person. If the productivity goal appears beyond the reach of the person striving for the reward, then the motivational effect will be lower and productivity may decline. But if the reward system is correctly structured, productivity experts argue, it is possible to persuade people to achieve remarkable results.
According to the passage, it states that reward system increases the productivity. However, the lecturer contradicts by giving various cases in which productivity may be decrease or employees may be disappoint by it.
First, the passage states that the approach of getting employees to work hard or improve productivity is to reward them. But, the lecturer contradicts it. He says that people actually don't like reward system. It actually don't work as per the expectation.
Second, the passage states that whatever the type of reward given, managerial consultants point out that the promise of such incentives improves employee attitudes, motivation and productivity. But, according to the lecture, higher the reward, higher the desire to achieve and higher the disappointment if it can't be achieved. Employees now understand that reward system manipulates them to work hard. Employees always expects more rewards than there are awarded.
Finally, the lecturer says that employees don't like to ask doubts to the people who have many rewards. They give them negative rating and they feel disappointed. But, the passage doesn't state anything about it.
To conclude, according to passage the reward system is the best to improve Employees productivity and motivate them. But, the lecturer says that the reward system has many negative consequences on employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
According to the passage, it states that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e or employees may be disappoint by it. First, the passage states that the a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...adicts it. He says that people actually dont like reward system. It actually dont wo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...le actually dont like reward system. It actually dont work as per the expectation. S...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ly dont like reward system. It actually dont work as per the expectation. S...
^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ually dont work as per the expectation. Second, the passage states that what...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eve and higher the disappointment if it cant be achieved. Employees now understand t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...eve and higher the disappointment if it cant be achieved. Employees now understand t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts more rewards than there are awarded. Finally, the lecturer says that employ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han there are awarded. Finally, the lecturer says that employees dont li...
^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ally, the lecturer says that employees dont like to ask doubts to the people who ha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hey feel disappointed. But, the passage doesnt state anything about it. To co...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...passage doesnt state anything about it. To conclude, according to passage the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49763033175 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8662604364 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526066350711 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0742201354 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3333333333 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0666666667 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256021129106 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09483009948 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102187426348 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15739074456 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628016109465 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.