Recently, there has been a debate about the approach that may apply to stop the Torreya tacifoha tree from extinction.
Recently, there has been a debate about the approach that may apply to stop the Torreya tacifoha tree from extinction. A group of scientists suggests three way to help Torreya tacifoha to survive, which represented by the author in the reading passage, while, another group of researchers opposes all these approaches and said they are not successful at all, as what the professor does in the lecture.
First of all, the lecturer claims that the planting of Torreya tacifoha in their original land of living, is not effective in decrease the rate of declining as the author assume, to state it more clearly, the area of microclimate where the tree has been naturally lived, is already affected by the climate changes, may be because of the global warming, also, the wet area has been dried recently, so it is no longer suitable for the growth of this kind of tree. As long with this evidence, the first approach in the reading passage is no longer acceptable.
Second, the professor maintains the opposite side of view regarding the planting of the Torreya toxifai, in another area,because the possibility of uncontrolled growth of this trees in their new habitat, then he gives example about the changing of black locus natural habitat, however, that the tree had thrived there, but, on the other hand, they had a bad impact on the other plant in the area, that in turn might lead to extinct on other native plants. So the text second suggestion is practically undoable.
Finally, the lecturer asserts that for such kind of tree to be survive and to protect themselves from disease and other risk factors, literary, they have to be large and diverse, as the lab capacity couldn't handle this large size and number of trees, so the author third approach of lab preserving of the tree, in order to help the Toorreya tacifoha to stop declining, is not believable anymore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, there has been a debate about ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the professor does in the lecture. First of all, the lecturer claims that t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ading passage is no longer acceptable. Second, the professor maintains the oppo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , because
... of the Torreya toxifai, in another area,because the possibility of uncontrolled growth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... another area,because the possibility of uncontrolled growth of this trees in the...
^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... possibility of uncontrolled growth of this trees in their new habitat, then he giv...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd suggestion is practically undoable. Finally, the lecturer asserts that for s...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... large and diverse, as the lab capacity couldnt handle this large size and number of tr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, third, while, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83177570093 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55822237173 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542056074766 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 21.2450331126 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 163.643090977 49.2860985944 332% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 221.571428571 110.228320801 201% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.8571428571 21.698381199 211% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.2857142857 7.06452816374 259% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366416778189 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215149925531 0.0996497079465 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.324870717947 0.0662205650399 491% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214795234396 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158213764225 0.0443174109184 357% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.2 13.3589403974 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.0289183223 179% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.498013245 191% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.2008830022 179% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.