Recently, there has been a debate about the (let it burn policy), which means that letting the forest burns without suppression the fire.
Recently, there has been a debate about the (let it burn policy), which means that letting the forest burns without suppression the fire. A group of scientists opposes this policy and gives many disadvantages of it, as the author does in the reading passage, while another group of scientist supports this policy and says it is a very good one and the professor in the lecture is one of the supporters.
First of all, the lecture maintains an opposite side of view regarding the effects of the natural fire on the forest plants, the professor claims that this fire gives the opportunity to other vegetation to appear in the area of fire which is not existing before, for example, a smaller plants which need more shade or light to grow, in addition to that, some plant's seed can't germinate unless they expose to high level of heat, so the let it burn policy would increase the diversity of the forest. Thus, the author assumption about the bad impact of the forest fire is practically not making sense.
Second, the professor asserts that the increase in plants diversity, may, in turn, increase the animals diversity as a result, for instance, the new small vegetation would be an ideal habitat for small animals like rabbits, then, these little animals would be a good food resource for the large animals, that would lead to starting a new food chain in the region. By this point, the professor casts the doubt about the text concern about the decrease in the animal in the area of the fire.
Finally, the lecturer claims that the fire might affect the tourists if that would happen each year, besides that, the situation to start fire like the 1988 fire would not be available continuously, like the lack of rain and the high speed wind ,so the tourists keep coming to this area despite the last fire. So the reading passage point about the decrease in the number of tourists would be unbelievable, especially if we know, that this kind of fire never happened again since 1988.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the lecture is one of the supporters. First of all, the lecture maintains an o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
..., in addition to that, some plants seed cant germinate unless they expose to high le...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fire is practically not making sense. Second, the professor asserts that the i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...s diversity, may, in turn, increase the animals diversity as a result, for instance, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the animal in the area of the fire. Finally, the lecturer claims that the fi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the lack of rain and the high speed wind ,so the tourists keep coming to this area...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70114942529 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36227171432 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511494252874 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 21.2450331126 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.56754995 49.2860985944 263% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 204.5 110.228320801 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.5 21.698381199 200% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.75 7.06452816374 265% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320788150558 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186727977294 0.0996497079465 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.276618706662 0.0662205650399 418% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209609804676 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175192825611 0.0443174109184 395% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.3589403974 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.0289183223 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.87 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.498013245 183% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.