Reward system
The lecturer provides the opposite opinion concerning what article offered.
The article points out, how advantageous producing and reward system is.
Behaviour that is rewarded, tends to be repeated. Provided that, employee’s productivity increases, they work harder and are hugely motivated.
The lecturer finds hiding and deeper results. The most persuasive argument he states is, that many researches showed, people do not like this reward system. They prefer to get paid, rather being given some respect and gifts. Furthermore, most of them perceive rewards as “punishment” and as being controlled. Another key aspect the lecturer discusses is, that people who expect a reward, more desired the reward is, more disappointed they become, when don’t achieve their goal. Another key thing to remember, sometimes the employees stay quiet, when they need some help from their supervisors. Some of them believe, if they need ask questions, employer will consider them as unskilled. It directly affects on their performance and reduces it.
All in all, by the points of view we can see that there are mostly disadvantages in the above mentioned system. We can agree, that employers should search for more acceptable ways to increase employee’s quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 705, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oyer will consider them as unskilled. It directly affects on their performance an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60512820513 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05894749274 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.702564102564 0.540411800872 130% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 3.0 0.116997792494 2564% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0913873626 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0714285714 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9285714286 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.35714285714 7.06452816374 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236263708755 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724257855173 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112393764249 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125369243014 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135892722745 0.0443174109184 307% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.