robustus
According to the reading, a recently discovered fossil of a mammal known as robustus with a dinosaur called psittacocosaur in its stomach, does not indicates that robustus actively haunted the psittacocosaur. The lecturer casts doubts on the reasons mentioned in the reading.
Firstly, the reading states that since robustus was much smaller than a psittacocosaur, it couldn’t be the predator of this kind of dinosaur. The lecturer refutes this argument by saying that robustus is twice the size of a baby psittacocosaur, so it is possible that the robustus hunted a baby psittacocosaur.
Secondly, the reading claims that robustus’s legs are positioned to the side and that they are noticeably short, so it was not able to chase after fast-moving animals like psittacocosaurs. On the contrary, the lecturer mentions that a modern day mammal named Tasmanian Devil has the same leg features as robustus, but it can run fast enough to be an active and successful predator. He concludes that robustus could have actively haunted his prey just like Tasmanian Devils do now.
Last but not least, the reading posits that because there are no teeth marks on its body, the psittacocosaur inside this robustus could not be actively haunted and that maybe robustus swallowed an unattended psittacocosaur egg. In contrast, the lecturer asserts that since robustus used to swallow their prey in whole or in big pieces of meat, this is not a valid reason. In other words, the robustus could have swallowed a baby psittacocosaur whole. Also, the lack of teeth marks is due to the fact that robustus had no mark on its back teeth, which were probably not used for chewing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'indicate'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: indicate
...psittacocosaur in its stomach, does not indicates that robustus actively haunted the psit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'indicate'
Suggestion: indicate
...psittacocosaur in its stomach, does not indicates that robustus actively haunted the psit...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08363636364 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04283469403 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.867515491 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.090909091 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43770921865 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194732207044 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849148590544 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29174642813 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362359430642 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.