Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage.
Both the main topic of passage and the lecture is to discuss whether materials could relate to remains of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix. The author argues about there are some reasons which show that approves these remains, while the professor, in contrast, not only refutes the author's claims but also asserts that these reasons are skeptical, on a number of accounts elaborated upon here under. To commence with, both the passage and the lecturer discuss soft, flexible organic substance inside the channels. The author claims that the presence of these soft material related to remains of the actual blood vessels of T.rex
. The professor contradicts this idea by asserting that the presence of soft, flexible substance is not necessary related to the T.rex
. Furthermore, he adds that after the death of animals, some bacteria colonize inside the hollows in the bone and produced such these organic materials. Thus, these remains left by bacteria colonize inside the bone's channels. In addition, both the writer and the speaker argue about the presence of sphere inside the bone. The author points out that this sphere could relate to the remains of red blood cells. The speaker, on the other hand, states that researchers found the bone of another animal in the same place of this bone. They did not found any red blood on this animal, thus it is not possible the sphere related to red blood cells. In addition, he says that the sphere reddish color made by some reddish minerals. The last allegation of the author against which the professor states is that the presence of collagen on the bone. The author states that these collagen could relate to the T.rex
as the main component of living bone tissue. The lecturer claims that the collagen could not preserve in a long time. This bone back to 70 million years ago and it is obvious that this collagen related to the much more recent source. It is possible that it related to the hand of researchers who handling the bone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 649, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ns of the actual blood vessels of T.rex . The professor contradicts this idea by ...
^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e is not necessary related to the T.rex . Furthermore, he adds that after the dea...
^^
Line 3, column 864, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this collagen' or 'these collagens'?
Suggestion: this collagen; these collagens
...gen on the bone. The author states that these collagen could relate to the T.rex as the main ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e main component of living bone tissue. The lecturer claims that the collagen could...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, thus, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86549707602 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29054272879 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438596491228 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.054644606 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8823529412 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0160964117775 0.272083759551 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00653465691098 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0142369413254 0.0662205650399 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00698568201868 0.162205337803 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120995561819 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.