Summarize the points made in lecture, being sure to explain how they contrast with Specific points in the reading passage.
The passage highlights the advantages of pruning. However, the points made by the lecturer showed that pruning could be harmful, if carried out carelessly. He described the silver maple tree of his neighbor to illustrate how poor pruning may end up in a disaster.
First of all, an improper pruning, called tree topping, leads to many weak side branches. Cutting the tip of the branches not only enhances side branching but also accelerates the branch growth. Therefore, they may break off easily and fall on the vehicles or the pedestrians.
Second, removing a considerable amount of leaves dramatically decreases photosynthesis. In that case the poor tree starves and dies. The non-vital branches cannot bear harsh weather conditions. Dead trees are a potential hazard for the neighborhood. Moreover, parasites tend to invade the dead wood and weaken the tree further.
Finally, tree topping results in several weak branches and an eyesoring shape of the crown of the tree. This ugly appearance is in complete contrast with the main idea of pruning.
This is why the lecturer believes that in order to have a healthy and beautiful tree, pruning should be practiced very wisely
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...own of the tree. This ugly appearance is in complete contrast with the main idea ...
^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to have a healthy and beautiful tree, pruning should be practiced very wisely
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20942408377 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80144343235 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.69109947644 0.540411800872 128% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1066736539 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.0714285714 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6428571429 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119182509488 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368710503285 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585777589369 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647146638362 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635873829127 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.