Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented the reading passage.
The main topic of the both passage and the lecture is to discuss whether some suggestion could be effective for controlling cane toad population or not. The author proposed some solution to cease the population growth of cane toad, while the professor not only refutes the author's claims but also assert that these suggestions would be unsuccessful and cause damages to the environment on a number of accounts elaborated upon hereunder.
To commence with, both the author and the lecturer argues about the effectiveness of fence for blocking the spread of toad in other portions of Australia. The author claims that a fence could inhibit the moving of toads as well as some rabbits' prevention in the 12th century.The professor contradicts this idea by asserting that young toads and toad's eggs spread out of fence by streams and rivers, and this streams which flow from one side of the fence to another side. Thus, the young toads and eggs help to establish the toad population. Consequently, the fence could not be effective and ban the spread of the toads in Australia.
In addition, both the author and the speaker discuss capturing and destroying toad by some volunteers. The author says that in the habitat of the toads, people should camping and attempt to spot and kill them.The professor, on the other hand, states that some untrained volunteers could destroy many frogs which these frogs are one the most important part of native Australia' s ecosystems. She further adds that it is too hard identification of the frog and toad when they are young.
The last allegation of the author against which the professor argues is that spreading the disease-causing virus to kill this toad and regulate their population.The professor claims that it is not a good idea because it could have some terrible results for cane toad originally. In addition, many of reptile and amphibian transported to another area such as America by researchers or other people. It is enough, one of these ill animals spread in another area for harming to all another toad. In addition, she states that the toad is a native animal for U.S ecosystem and the spread of infection could devastate the whole ecosystems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rabbits'' or 'rabbit's'?
Suggestion: rabbits'; rabbit's
...bit the moving of toads as well as some rabbits prevention in the 12th century.The prof...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... rabbits prevention in the 12th century.The professor contradicts this idea by asse...
^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...mping and attempt to spot and kill them.The professor, on the other hand, states th...
^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...this toad and regulate their population.The professor claims that it is not a good ...
^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... that the toad is a native animal for U.S ecosystem and the spread of infection c...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, thus, well, while, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 7.30242825607 260% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9539295393 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70966664269 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479674796748 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.7649188292 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.615384615 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3846153846 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0237164695473 0.272083759551 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0124148196717 0.0996497079465 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0189299365008 0.0662205650399 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0191814261418 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191022929354 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.