test
ow that we have the necessary hardware we first make sure that are PL-259 is securely attached to its opposing connector. And then take a towel and clean all outer surfaces with the rubbing alcohol. We just want to remove any oil and dirt; we don't need to make it surgically clean. Now wrap a layer of the scotch mastic tape starting one inch behind the PL-259 on the coax and continue wrapping over the connector And it's opposing surface. Being sure to overlap each turn by half.
The second step we will repeat the same wrapping style only using the splicing compound and beginning where we left off with the mastic tape and going towards the coax. Make this go one-inch further down the coax from where you started with the mastic tape.
The final step is over wrap every thing you all ready done with the Scotch super 33+ Tape again starting inch below where you ended with the splicing compound and over lapping each turn by half a wrap.
Okay, I admit this is over doing it a bit. But I never had this method fail. And while I will freely admit I have not done thousands of these on antennas. I used this same exact method in weather proofing electrical connections that was exposed to some really harsh conditions. And that's where I discovered just how great it worked. After removing the covering I made on them some 15 years latter they looked as great as the day I made them.
So there it is fellows. No reason now for not knowing how to water proof the PL-259!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ow
ow that we have the necessary hardware we ...
^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ust want to remove any oil and dirt; we dont need to make it surgically clean. Now w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ed to some really harsh conditions. And thats where I discovered just how great it wo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... I discovered just how great it worked. After removing the covering I made on them so...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...s. No reason now for not knowing how to water proof the PL-259!
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, really, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42647058824 5.08290768461 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09789604606 2.5805825403 81% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595588235294 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2276069508 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.25 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 7.06452816374 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.3589403974 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 53.8541721854 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 12.2367328918 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.