Torreya taxifolia,
The author in the passage is concerned about the possible extinction of Torreya species which is why she/ he has provided three possible solutions to mitigate the issue. Surprisingly, the speaker in the lecture seems to be at odds with her/ his strategy. She goes on to dismiss not only the first solution which was restablishing plant in same area, but she also condemns the other two options of assisteed migration as well as preservation in research centres.
As the writer attempts to establish the point of view that the humid microcliamte of North America supports the growth of these species, they should be planted again at same regions, the orator points out that this is no longer valid. She goes on to elaborate that this microcliamte is gettign affected by the surrounding less humid cliamte in that region possibly due to global warming or the fact that the region is getting drier. This is why the first solution of the writer will no longer be valid.
Moving further, the lecturer goes on to contend the second option of assisted migration of the plants by pointing it out as a possible threat. When the author suggested to move the plant into colder Northern region since the microclimate is more favourable there, the speaker brings light into the context by giving the example of similar previous attempts and its failure of planting Black Locust Tree. Not only did it grow expansively but it also imposed threat to other endangeres plants.
Now, these cotnenetions were not enough to dismiss the essayist already,the speaker pulls one final string as the ultimate to condemn the last point on preservation of species in the research centre. According to the orator, this solution is nto practical because the large population of the Torreya species won'tbe able to withstand the diseases wehn sotred in research labs as they are genetically diverse and the centres can't accomodate them all. In this way,the final solution is dismissed as well.
So, it is in this manner, that the possible solutions of the essayist are weakened through the explanations on each proposed options as changing microcliamte, threat of endangering other species and risk of low disease resistance, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested moving'.
Suggestion: suggested moving
...t as a possible threat. When the author suggested to move the plant into colder Northern region s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...t enough to dismiss the essayist already,the speaker pulls one final string as the u...
^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...are genetically diverse and the centres cant accomodate them all. In this way,the fi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 461, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...es cant accomodate them all. In this way,the final solution is dismissed as well. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 367.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04632152589 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70934858536 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 145.348785872 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547683923706 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.1386678198 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.461538462 110.228320801 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0371919221373 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0133472964376 0.0996497079465 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031410278555 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0201670063491 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247066045532 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.