torreya taxifolia
The purpose of this article is to address the way to preserve the tree 'torreya taxifolia' from extinction. More specifically, the author gives three ways to preserve it. In the listening part, the professor disagrees with the methods. She believes these are not the best ways to preserve the trees from extinction and refutes each of the points stated in the reading.
The author begins the reading by stating that the first method is to reestablsih. The lecturer, on the other hand, is not convinced. According to her, the environment and climatic condition of Florida is not suitable for the tree in recent days. She continues by saying that due to the global warning the climatic condition has become unfavorable for the torreya taxifolia trees in recent days.
In addition, the author says that Torreya can be saved by relocating it into next places. Again, the lecture believes that author's suggestion is flawed.The speaker believes that the Torreya has high possibility to flourish it is relocated and keep other species of plant into danger.
Finally, the author suggests to preserve the plant to save it from extinction. In the listening part, the lecturer doubts that the method will work. She says that the plant should have to face different kinds of diseases. For that, diverse group of Torreya Plant should be kept in the lab. But it impossible to build such a large lab.
To summarize, both the writer and lecture have contrary views on preservation of the Torreya plant. It is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ieves that authors suggestion is flawed.The speaker believes that the Torreya has h...
^^^
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests preserving'.
Suggestion: suggests preserving
...plant into danger. Finally, the author suggests to preserve the plant to save it from extinction. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93181818182 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55503023906 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1102351134 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5882352941 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219168985297 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624395025821 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097676258654 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112174954707 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326991042063 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.