The passage and the lecture both are about the same topic which is whether to use employee five days a week or four days a week. The author of the passage states that four days a week job for employees would has better results. However, the professor casts doubts on the author claims. He thinks that there would be no benefit for company or employees at all.
First of all, author believes that offering employee to work four days a week, with less salary have better results for company and economy, and employees would do better job with higher quality. The professor rebuts this point by saying that it will cost more for company for providing training, health insurance, offices and computers for employees.
Second, the author claims that it would solve unemployment issue by hiring more people. The professor refutes this by mention that after establishing four days a week, employees would say that they do job of five days a week and therefor there is no need to hire extra people.
Third, the author posits that it would bring more quality to employees' life and help them to have better life. The professor goes against that by declaring for employees to advance in their job they need to work five days a week and not interacting enough with job might cause them to lose their job. Furthermore for superior to control the company it is necessary to be at company five days a week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...our days a week job for employees would has better results. However, the professor ...
^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...job might cause them to lose their job. Furthermore for superior to control the company it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.285714285714 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.154135338346 0.158904122519 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0526315789474 0.0723426182421 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0112781954887 0.0435111971325 26% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0413533834586 0.0277247811725 149% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127819548872 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0263157894737 0.0370669169778 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.30078787082 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0375939849624 0.0208969081088 180% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.109022556391 0.128158765124 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0300751879699 0.0158828679856 189% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00375939849624 0.0114777025283 33% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1401.0 1645.83664459 85% => OK
No of words: 246.0 271.125827815 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69512195122 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.30487804878 0.374372842146 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.215447154472 0.287516216867 75% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.126016260163 0.187439937562 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0853658536585 0.113142543107 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30078787082 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491869918699 0.539623497131 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.4129531917 53.8517498576 84% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 22.3636363636 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8309779512 49.3711431718 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.363636364 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 43.9083518108 50.5018328374 87% => OK
Elegance: 2.12727272727 1.90840788429 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.559992142323 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149783294387 0.142949733639 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0679368157397 0.0787303798458 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.626749239436 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13947671836 0.139662658121 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.269487285768 0.266732575781 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658374669893 0.103435571967 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.33595309453 0.414875509568 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0369004148513 0.0530846634433 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.403919690955 0.40443939384 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617342569705 0.0528353158467 117% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.