The lecture and paragraph are discussing about the policy of working in four-day a week. The paragraph is displaying the pros of the four day policy while the lecture is casting doubt on it.
Discussing about the loss and benefits to the company with the four day week policy, the paragraph shows that this policy will not affect cost to the company as they are reducing pay from 100% to 80% and fifth day is being compensated by the reduction in pay of the four day employee and quality of the work will increase. Whereas lecture goes into depth of the pay structure which comprises medical allowance which has to be given separately for each employee. This will increase additional cost to the company and new employees need training which will augment the cost to the company. Additional employees require space and separate computers to work which will lead infrastructural cost to the company. Apart from these, company has to invest more in hiring process because hiring of new employees are costly in compare to the existing ones.
About the economic benefits of the country, paragraph shows that this policy will reduce the unemployment level while lecturer says it will affect adversely because expectations of the company will increase and they will give same load of 5 days to be done in 4 days which says no additional work for the 5th day and leads to no additional job.
In terms of employee life, paragraph displays that they will be more free and can spend time with families with leisure whereas lecture shows that employees will loose interest towards the work and there is a risk of reducing quality of life. Promotions will be competitive and tough for four day week employees because it is obvious for a company to choose five days week employee to promote.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ereas lecture shows that employees will loose interest towards the work and there is ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'whereas', 'while', 'apart from', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.284829721362 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.160990712074 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0650154798762 0.0723426182421 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.015479876161 0.0435111971325 36% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0185758513932 0.0277247811725 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136222910217 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0433436532508 0.0370669169778 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49938824757 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0433436532508 0.0208969081088 207% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.111455108359 0.128158765124 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0402476780186 0.0158828679856 253% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015479876161 0.0114777025283 135% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1781.0 1645.83664459 108% => OK
No of words: 307.0 271.125827815 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8013029316 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.309446254072 0.374372842146 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267100977199 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175895765472 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104234527687 0.113142543107 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49938824757 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449511400651 0.539623497131 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.8178625342 53.8517498576 81% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 30.7 21.7502111507 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.5714565369 49.3711431718 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.1 132.220823453 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7 21.7502111507 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.878197800319 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 57.4100977199 50.5018328374 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.38095238095 1.90840788429 125% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.562469913346 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.233137990565 0.142949733639 163% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.128112769468 0.0787303798458 163% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.711973740353 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171627168175 0.139662658121 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.309752557673 0.266732575781 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727464106472 0.103435571967 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.458992482238 0.414875509568 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.081612985463 0.0530846634433 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.408309048292 0.40443939384 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708826981482 0.0528353158467 134% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.