Car manufacturers and governments are seeking the replacement of internal combustion engine with hydrogen based engine. Paragraph states the advantages of the hydrogen-based-fuel-cell over the internal combustion engine in terms of pollution, availability and economically cheap. Whereas, lecture casts doubt on the explanation mentioned in the paragraph.
Firstly, paragraph states that hydrogen is available easily for hydrogen based fuel cell in compare to petroleum because hydrogen is renewable source of energy which can be obtained from water and natural gas. Contrary to this opinion, lecture says that in spite of availability of hydrogen in water and natural gases, hydrogen based engine can not use this direct hydrogen from renewable sources. It requires pure liquid hydrogen which can be prepared artificially which is difficult to produce and difficult to store. It requires cold storage with -200 degree Celsius temperature.
Secondly, paragraph depicts that hydrogen based fuel engine is environment friendly as byproduct of this engine is water which does not create pollution. Contrary to this point, lecture explains that automobiles having hydrogen based engine are not creating pollution but production of hydrogen based engine creates lot of pollution. Liquid hydrogen creation from water and gas in factories require burning of coal and oil which is indirectly creating pollution to the environment.
Thirdly, paragraph states that hydrogen based engine is more efficient and economic in compare to internal combustion engine. Casting doubt on the explanation mentioned in the paragraph, lecture states that hydrogen based engine is more costlier because components of the engine requires platinum which is very costly and rare metal. Replacement of platinum from other metals in hydrogen based fuel engine shows unsuccessful results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n, availability and economically cheap. Whereas, lecture casts doubt on the explanation...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'costlier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: costlier
...re states that hydrogen based engine is more costlier because components of the engine requir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'whereas', 'in fact', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.351351351351 0.261695866417 134% => OK
Verbs: 0.172297297297 0.158904122519 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0777027027027 0.0723426182421 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0472972972973 0.0435111971325 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00675675675676 0.0277247811725 24% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.131756756757 0.128828473217 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0540540540541 0.0370669169778 146% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01124086176 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0236486486486 0.0208969081088 113% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0472972972973 0.128158765124 37% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0101351351351 0.0158828679856 64% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0236486486486 0.0114777025283 206% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1858.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 274.0 271.125827815 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.78102189781 6.08160592843 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.503649635036 0.374372842146 135% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.390510948905 0.287516216867 136% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.313868613139 0.187439937562 167% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167883211679 0.113142543107 148% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01124086176 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470802919708 0.539623497131 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.572378339 53.8517498576 83% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0769230769 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1823393261 49.3711431718 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.923076923 132.220823453 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 60.1280179674 50.5018328374 119% => OK
Elegance: 2.37313432836 1.90840788429 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.545760050767 0.549887131256 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.186431623719 0.142949733639 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.107311003042 0.0787303798458 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.626730123143 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162950500772 0.139662658121 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.253745879239 0.266732575781 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123643182983 0.103435571967 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.369448673167 0.414875509568 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.107146982757 0.0530846634433 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.405092141864 0.40443939384 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844712146233 0.0528353158467 160% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.