The reading passage discusses an interesting topic about how young people are less interesting in reading literature, novels, plays and poems and provides extensive reasons for support. However, the lecture casts doubts on the claim made by the author of the reading passage. She thinks that young people are still interesting and what really changes is the way young people approach to books.
Firs of all, the reading passage argues that literature is the only way to encourage young's imagination and intellectual stimulation. On the other hand, the lecture refute this concept by explaining that novels are not the only way to stimulate imagination. Moreover, not always literature books are synonym of good writing.
Secondly, the reading passage states that the lack of literature reading contributes to lowered the level of culture in general. On the contrary, the lecture explains how culture changes in their way to consume art and literature. To illustrate this idea, the lecture points out other cultural manifestation like music and movies that are part of culture in a very positive way.
Finally, the lecture agrees in some point with the reading passage in the fact that novels and having less financial support for their production, but disagree with the reading passage in the cause of it. On opposite to the reading, the lecturer blame the low quality of the authors than the readers for this issue.
In summary, for all the reason exposes above, the reading passage fail to support the theory that young people are reading less, today. Thus, the lecture effectively refutes every point stated by the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e synonym of good writing. Secondly, the reading passage states that the lack...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in general, in summary, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19172932331 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55348408367 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522556390977 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3890469042 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.230769231 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366870241709 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138847153991 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873161143718 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218584226124 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259379908318 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.