The passage states that there is problem in reading literature that affect reading in public. The professor refutes this idea and opposes each three reasons.
First, the passage states there is deccrease in literature reading because of non intellectual reasons. The professor opposes with this opinion and beleive there are many high quality books in science, history, and etc. that people can take advantage of them. In addition, these books have high qualities and very creative. So lack of readers in literature does not show lack of people who follow books.
Second, the passage points out the alternative books that citizens use are not efficient and suitable. On the contrary the professor beleive the culture is changed and people are moving to the other type of novels.
Third, the passage informs that there are many outstanding authors and lack of audience can cause the final production to be poor and unqualified. However, the professor speaks about high supports. He beleives modern literature is difficult to understand on the other hand in formal type there are many readers who are looking for reading literature.
For conclusion, the passage provides three reasons for lack of audience in literature books and correlates that to the decrease in overal number of readers. But the speaker provides three reason for opposing those type of reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...high quality books in science, history, and etc. that people can take advantage of them....
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in addition', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.285123966942 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.161157024793 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.099173553719 0.0723426182421 137% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0206611570248 0.0435111971325 47% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.00826446280992 0.0277247811725 30% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.123966942149 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0289256198347 0.0370669169778 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5406570049 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0165289256198 0.0208969081088 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00413223140496 0.00154638098197 267% => OK
Determiners: 0.095041322314 0.128158765124 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00826446280992 0.0158828679856 52% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0123966942149 0.0114777025283 108% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1370.0 1645.83664459 83% => OK
No of words: 220.0 271.125827815 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22727272727 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.413636363636 0.374372842146 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.331818181818 0.287516216867 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.195454545455 0.187439937562 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122727272727 0.113142543107 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5406570049 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513636363636 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 46.3092665463 53.8517498576 86% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.7142857143 21.7502111507 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1316329268 49.3711431718 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 132.220823453 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 21.7502111507 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.878197800319 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 48.8961038961 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 2.30434782609 1.90840788429 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.616751758937 0.549887131256 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102993799614 0.142949733639 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0976840198356 0.0787303798458 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.585737264088 0.631733273073 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17372323323 0.139662658121 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248922716188 0.266732575781 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122742931708 0.103435571967 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.340403679562 0.414875509568 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0534802997713 0.0530846634433 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.413490974378 0.40443939384 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337324501706 0.0528353158467 64% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.