The reading states that some measures have been proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia. Howevere the professor says that the measurs are nod good and have some damages and he refutes each of author's measure.
First, the reading claims that building a national fence would prevent the spread of the toad. The professor says that it does not help to stop the spread of the toad. He explains that cane toad can easily move from one side to other sides.
Second, the reading states that the toads could be captured and destroyed by volunteers. However, the professor says that although the volunteers would capture some cane toad, they may destroy some others animals. He provides example of frogs. The professor says that people who try to capture the cane toad, destroy native forgs.
Third, the reading states that which is developed by researchers is useful to control the cane toad populations. However, the professor says that a disease-causing virus is not a good way. He explains that some native species may be destroy. In fact, this way is bad for origin habitats. He says that this way suffer the ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e forgs. Third, the reading states that which is developed by researchers is use...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, third, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83163265306 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35740236225 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4628787543 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.6428571429 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384244006985 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151397132737 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103932853019 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262842277183 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713949585424 0.0443174109184 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.3589403974 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.