The United Kingdom now then Great Britain has been a rich excavation treasure for archaelogists. Things excavated include buildings, tools and other art from stone age to the era of beginning of industrial age. Twientieth century faced many hurdles in the field of archeology, which was very much keen in the study of those old artifacts. On account of limitations, three major factors were responsible for the limitations in Britain.
Contruction Projects.
In 1950, construction sites came across many valuable artifacts while excavating the construction site for builders but were ignored due to consistent construction project building. Many valuable and important excavated artifacts were destroyed during the process resulting into less research study material for archeologists.
Financial Support.
Less financial aid provided only by government, proved to be another key factor faced by researchers in that field. Only limited number of excavations were done with fistful result in hands.
Less Jobs.
Availability of few jobs in the archeology department of colleges and government agencies, made archeology students to opt for another filed as their career. Even the researchers in this field were left unpaid for their research work. But, in 1990 new rules declared by British government improved the situation for archaeologists. New rules for excavating the construction site for artifacts and preserving them, while maintaining document were made. Also, the construction excavated site were asked to pay the amount for excavations initially followed by preservation process through government. Researchers interested in this field were paid sufficient funds for their work, theories and research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun Jobs is countable.
Suggestion: Fewer
...e done with fistful result in hands. Less Jobs. Availability of few jobs in the ...
^^^^
Line 10, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent of colleges and government agencies, made archeology students to opt for anot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7874015748 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06593587668 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637795275591 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1181978377 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 7.06452816374 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334505126399 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103102892272 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509167563323 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160797533859 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884376866058 0.0443174109184 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.2367328918 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.