he article states that the science of archaeology was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britian and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that in 1990, a new law legistalated in Britian that has been changed the field of arachaelogy. And she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims thatmany valuable artificats were lost to construction projects since the growth of population from 1950. The prfoessor refutes this point by stating that before any building or construction established, it should examined by arachaeologists expert to determine wheather it has a valuable or interested artificate. If yes, the local governemnts should do a plan to preserve the locations, which is done by building arounf the site, or documentating the site.
Second, the article posits that many archaeologists felt that financial supports are not enough for archaeological research. On the other hand, the professor explains that archaelogists are getting well-paid by construction comapnies and not by the governments as the author stated. by new law constructions comapny are paying for intial examined for specialists and also paying for funding any reasearch project in case of the location is valuable.
Third, the reading states that it was difficult to get a cerrer in archaeology field. The professor opposes this point by demonstrating all examined stages to be done in order to study artifcate location. It begins from inital examine, draw a perserve plan, then do research, and finally processing data to the system. She says all these stages need for high number of aracheologists, so, stages are create so many jobs that widly available than it was before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he article states that the science of arch...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'articles'.
Suggestion: articles
he article states that the science of archaeology ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...y the governments as the author stated. by new law constructions comapny are payin...
^^
Line 7, column 401, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...umber of aracheologists, so, stages are create so many jobs that widly available than ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34926470588 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0724539879 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606617647059 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8183137127 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.923076923 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262515231997 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844270735356 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071583680185 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141954458076 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538355813789 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.