In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture deal with the science archaeology in Britain. Regarding this topic, the reading passage asserts that the archaeologists have serious troubles with researching old cultural artifacts. From the lecturer’s view, however, the concept of the author is unconvincing because the new rules and guidelines improved these troubles in three areas mentioned in the passage.
First of all, according to the lecture, it is not unreliable that several construction projects destroy valuable archaeological artifacts, this is because the new rules that any construction company is able to start their works after taking an examination by archaeological experts. The examination will figure out whether the construction site has valuable meanings in archaeology or not, then if it has, the company should make a plan to preserve artifacts. This contradicts the author’s view point that the artifacts in construction sites might destroyed when workers of construction companies processed their projects.
Secondly, the financial problem of archaeologists was improved because the archaeologists in Britain got new financial supports by construction companies. To be specific, the examination of a construction site by archaeological experts allows the experts to get money from the construction company. Also, construction companies’ supports have a vital role in expanding areas where the experts can research. This counters the author’s argument that the financial support for archaeological experts is unfair and there are some interesting projects without any financial support.
Lastly, the author points out that the difficulty of having a career in archaeology is the lack of available positions for people in archaeology. However, the lecturer rebuts this point of view because several paid jobs that are available to archaeologists were created after the new policies were implemented. For instance, the test of construction site is included several diversified stages which provide archaeologists with many opportunities to get a job. Further, it cause to the increasing of people in archaeology and the number of archaeologists is the largest than ever before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 474, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...opportunities to get a job. Further, it cause to the increasing of people in archaeol...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'for instance', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.297082228117 0.261695866417 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.132625994695 0.158904122519 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0822281167109 0.0723426182421 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0291777188329 0.0435111971325 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0132625994695 0.0277247811725 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135278514589 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0344827586207 0.0370669169778 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.38392856972 2.5805825403 131% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0212201591512 0.0208969081088 102% => OK
Particles: 0.0053050397878 0.00154638098197 343% => OK
Determiners: 0.132625994695 0.128158765124 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0106100795756 0.0158828679856 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106100795756 0.0114777025283 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2246.0 1645.83664459 136% => OK
No of words: 332.0 271.125827815 122% => OK
Chars per words: 6.76506024096 6.08160592843 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.436746987952 0.374372842146 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.388554216867 0.287516216867 135% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.286144578313 0.187439937562 153% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.204819277108 0.113142543107 181% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.38392856972 2.5805825403 131% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521084337349 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 54.5500060977 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.7142857143 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3227413427 49.3711431718 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.428571429 132.220823453 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 62.569707401 50.5018328374 124% => OK
Elegance: 2.66666666667 1.90840788429 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.642074049962 0.549887131256 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.145614113286 0.142949733639 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0421160294689 0.0787303798458 53% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.645368330682 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0882635330694 0.139662658121 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.322616982686 0.266732575781 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868999163604 0.103435571967 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.426220393862 0.414875509568 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0379560243085 0.0530846634433 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.483590912135 0.40443939384 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621218773344 0.0528353158467 118% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.49668874172 229% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.