The professor completely disagrees with the points stated in the reading passage because she believes that new governmental rules and guidelines changed everything in the Uk.
First, She states that after these guidelines being applied, before start of every construction project it should be examined by government and archaelogists to see if this building has historical value or not. After examination even if the building was decided to be destroyed there would be some works like excavating that has to be done before construction. In contrary, the reading passage states that many valuable buildings were destroyed without any action.
Second, the professor points out that every construction company has to paid all expenses of examination and related works. So this is a new financial support source that gives many opporunities to archaelogists to research in the areas that were not possible before. On the other side, the reading passage claims that financial support is not sufficient for archaelogists.
Finally, she illustrates that with these guidelines there are many new job possibilities for archaelogists in all stages including examination, planning, and in data processing. With these new opportunities there are many experts in this field that is more than every time before. While the reading passage explains that having a job in the field of archaelogy is really hard now.
That's why the professor opposes all the points presented in the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t every construction company has to paid all expenses of examination and related ...
^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... archaelogy is really hard now. Thats why the professor opposes all the point...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, really, second, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97227577886 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556034482759 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.0176726028 49.2860985944 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167867213167 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704079217964 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402784588623 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082245039795 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539163802263 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.