TPO 17
The passage states that the number of birds in United states will decline in future and provides three reasons of support. The lecturer, nevertheless, says that none of the reasons are convincing and he disproves each of them.
First, the article claims that as human population and settlements continue to expand, bird;s habitats will disappear. Conversely, the lecturer opposes this point by explaining that there are better and larger habitats in urban areas. The professor contends that not only it isn't going to have uniform decline population in birds but also it causes the bird population will be increased.
In addition, the reading posits that by enhancing the agricultural activities, the bird habitats will be destructed more and more. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that even though the agricultural activities must increase in future but there will be fewer lands to use for that activities every year. According to the professor, the new lands are so productive and thus have more crops and foods. So, there is no need to destruct areas.
Finally, the passage expresses that by increasing the use of chemical pesticides, the bird population will be declined in future. Quite on the contrary, the lecturer emphasizes that the chemical may have this possible result but there are new methods to block this result. We also learn that one method is having new agriculture to use less chemical pesticides and another reason is about growing more persistent crop that helps to reduce chemical process and thus it does not hurt birds at all
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...The professor contends that not only it isnt going to have uniform decline populatio...
^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s, the bird population will be declined in future. Quite on the contrary, the lecturer em...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10116731518 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62836938748 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548638132296 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4921561389 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457251636339 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159778464744 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117179887186 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255997854171 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784715436893 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.