The article discusses a serious topic relating to the decline of toreyya and provides three reason of support to prevent the decline. However, the professor explains that none of the reasons provide satisfactory solution and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading passage discusses that planting the torreya plant in the places where it used to be i.e in coolest and dampest place will prevent its decline. In contrast , the professor provides information that climate of the coolest and dampest places is affected by the change in climate in larger area. This change can be attriibuted to the increase in global warming or to the reason that wet land throughout the florida is drained. Therefore it is difficult for the toreyya in thes areas. Clearly a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that planting toreyya in the previous locations will not improve its number.
Second, the article pushes forth the idea that by moving the toreyya to an entirely different locations, far from its florida microclimate will increase the population of toreyya. However, the speaker give the example of black locus plant which was moved to north. The effect of this movement was that it killed other trees or plants. He also states that it has unpredictable results. Consequently, we can argue that the claim made in the passage has unbearable results.
Finally, the reading posits that by preserving the toreyya in a closely monitored environment ie. in research centres, we can counter the problem. The professor refutes this point by explaining that research doesnot give the proper solution to this problem. He mentions that when torreya is put in reaserach centres, it cannot survive the diseases that are caused by the fact that there is lack of genetically diverse species.
In summary, while both passage and lecture provides interesting information regarding to the decline in numbers of toreyya , a significant amount of evidence supports that the methods mentioned in the passage doesnot clearly provide the ways to control the decline in numbers of toreyya. Therefore, the passage fails to justify the methods of preventing the ddecline of torreya.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ce will prevent its decline. In contrast , the professor provides information that...
^^
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...land throughout the florida is drained. Therefore it is difficult for the toreyya in thes...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing to the decline in numbers of toreyya , a significant amount of evidence suppor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, in contrast, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1373.03311258 137% => OK
No of words: 364.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17307692308 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68036129055 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.540411800872 94% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.342449382 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1052631579 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221222907501 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597669072554 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054433534448 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108391244856 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591430219904 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 63.6247240618 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.