The reading explains three possible ways of protecting Torreya taxifoha tree, however, the professor, in the lecture, states that these solutions are not satisfactory and refutes each of the author methods.
At first, the passage posits that reestablishing the torreya tree on it's previous original location where it has minor climate suitable for it's growth can help to thrive it's population. The professor confutes this point by saying that it is unlikely due to effect of large climate on micro-climate. She states that due to effect of global warming, the existence of the micro climate is becoming sparse, barely providing conducive environment for growth of Torreya.
Second, the reading claims that transferring torreya plantation, on the colder north location, may be another environment favorable of it's growth. On the other hand, the professor asserts that it may have negative impact on the original vegetation of the northern land. According to professor, similar experiment was conducted on Locus trees, and it thrive so copiously that it endangered the vegetation of northern land.
Third, the passage maintains that preserving it's seed on Research center is another promising method for the trees protection. The professor counter this point by explaining it may have serious impact of disease resisting capacity on those preserved seeds. We have came to know that research center cannot afford to hold all the species of Torreya tree and selecting particular species may not be successful because to become it disease resistant, it have to cross pollinate with other species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thrives'?
Suggestion: thrives
...nt was conducted on Locus trees, and it thrive so copiously that it endangered the veg...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...ter is another promising method for the trees protection. The professor counter this ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...acity on those preserved seeds. We have came to know that research center cannot aff...
^^^^
Line 7, column 452, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ause to become it disease resistant, it have to cross pollinate with other species.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.404 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79522163701 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4615392308 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.1 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273227755298 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10315479609 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664986663442 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154721290239 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265822347133 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.