According to the passages, plummeted population of the Torrey taxifoha in Florida and chances that this plant species extinct in short period. The author provides three possible solutions to save the extinction of this species such as reestablish similar location, relocate the area and preserve in the research center. Whereas, according to the lecture, the professor says that author provides three solutions is get the unsatisfactory result.
Firstly, the reading claims that organize the similar location as like the species live thousand years ago and this place scientist work in coolest and dampest area with plants of Torrey seeds. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that reestablish the location directly affect to the larger area. Increase the global warming and Florida drain, it is not possible to get the desired solutions.
Secondly, the passage emphasizes that planting Torrey seed and sapling in different coolest locations which away from the Florida microclimate, thus migration causes the growing of plant successfully. However, the speaker explains that relocations result of the decline vast number of other plant species. In past migration of the relocation of some plants causes killed the certain plant species. Therefore, relocation plants idea get the unpredictable result.
Lastly, the author implies that preserve plants in the research center, so, scientist easily observes the plant growth and conduct research to center. In contrary, the professor points out that plants need the large diversity to resist diseases and this is not possible for certain plant. An example, rays plant has no enough capacity to diverse and fails in the experiments.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in short, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49230769231 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65055537331 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546153846154 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1342153036 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186189389903 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674582778707 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396666910475 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112361087999 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118073610996 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.