TPO-2
The article states that the claim, in many organizations, it is better to assemble a group of people into a team and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that this offer has negative impact and refutes that each of author's reasons.
Firstly, the reading claims that, in the working as a team group, there are several people that have different knowledge and background, so they can work effectively. But the professor refutes this point by saying that there are some groups got almost free-ride and don’t do their task completely and other group that work hard and effectively cannot recognized.
Second, the article posits that, in these group, there are many people and they possess greater resources, so their task done quickly and rapidly. However, the professor says that it doesn’t work. According to the professor, in group process there are several people that have different ideas and opinions, so it takes a lot of time to meeting build to agree with idea.
Third, the reading says that leader group carry out the work that is involved by the decision that make by all members and group approach would be a great chance for member to shine, while the professor opposes this point by explaining that influential people maybe lead the group towards failure. When they get wrong decision, there are nobody to impact their decision and some member are really knowledgeable, ignored by other member, so as result the group project don't become success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., in many organizations, it is better to assemble a group of people into a team a...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...and provides three reasons of support. However the professor explains that this offer ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...aying that in the group, there are some group got almost free-riding and dont do thei...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e some group got almost free-riding and dont do their task completely and other grou...
^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p that work hard and effectively can not detected or recognized, so there are not...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'detect'
Suggestion: detect
...hat work hard and effectively can not detected or recognized, so there are not opportu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...o their task done quickly and rapidly. However the professor says that it dosenot work...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...osenot work. According to the professor,in group process there are several people ...
^^^
Line 10, column 114, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
... have different idea and opinion, so it take a lot of time to meeting to build and t...
^^^^
Line 11, column 444, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... member, so as result the group project dont become success.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01930501931 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48402717775 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525096525097 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0607651436 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.444444444 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7777777778 21.698381199 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.09492273731 244% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.