The article discusses the benefits of planting genetically modified trees and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that there are serious problems and cost of implementing genetic modifications on trees. She refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that genetically modified trees are hardier than nature trees, such as they are more likely to survive. The professor refutes this point by explaining that genetically modified trees may be resistant, but they can not ensure they could survive. She says that the nature tress that by nature are resistant to any climate changes or insects attacks, one species could be survive. On the other hand, the genetically modified trees are uniform, this means, if they expose to any environmental danger that are not designed to be be protected, all of them will die. Therefore, trees are genetically modified trees are not so completely survive against any new environmental or insect invasions.
Second, the article avers that genetically modified trees are economically beneficial because they grow faster than the nature once. Conversely, the professor disagrees this point by saying that there is hidden cost the author did not mention it. She explains that the cost of genetically modified trees seed are so expensive. Also, by law, if farmers collect seeds from these tress,they will have to pay to the companies, that owns these tress, in order to plants again.
Third, the reading posits that the use genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees; in other words these tress are satisfy the demand of fire wood and building timber and save endangered native trees. The professor refutes this point by saying that this use can be more dangerous to the native trees. She says that since this modified trees are more aggressive in growing, they will compete the native trees on their resources. For example, they will compete on sunlight, nutrients, and even the water. Therefore, modified trees will decline the populations of the natural tress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they can not ensure they could survive. She says that the nature tress that by n...
^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
...nmental danger that are not designed to be be protected, all of them will die. Theref...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tress' or 'these tresses'?
Suggestion: this tress; these tresses
..., by law, if farmers collect seeds from these tress,they will have to pay to the companies,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...f farmers collect seeds from these tress,they will have to pay to the companies, that...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tress' or 'these tresses'?
Suggestion: this tress; these tresses
...have to pay to the companies, that owns these tress, in order to plants again. Third, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tress' or 'these tresses'?
Suggestion: this tress; these tresses
...loitation of wild trees; in other words these tress are satisfy the demand of fire wood and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'satisfied'.
Suggestion: satisfied
...d trees; in other words these tress are satisfy the demand of fire wood and building ti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, for example, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3303030303 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75707787713 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493939393939 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2996655741 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.9375 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501262530588 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187711699958 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11349862507 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318437328633 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809235616842 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.