Tpo 22
The reader claims three possible arguments against using Ethanol as fuel and replacing the gasoline in the United States. He provides reasons for supporting his debate. On the other hand, the professor counters these specific points and presents clues to call into the information in the passage and he refuses each of the author’s reasons.
First, the professor says the Ethanol does not increase global warming because it produces from plants. And these plants are absorbing the CO2 which is the causes of global warming, so by that way, the plant releases the waste product come from consuming the Ethanol as fuel. In this way, the speaker opposites what the author disputes about the Ethanol will add a problem to the environment because it is using also produce the CO2, the greenhouse gas.
Second, the speaker discusses the Ethanol is not effecting on the food resources of the other animals because it is manufacturing from the cellulose part of the plant and this part does not eat by animals. So production of Ethanol will not reduce foods of animals as the reader says that enhancing the outputs of Ethanol will negatively influence on foods of the animals due to utilizing highly amount of plants.
Third, the professor says that the price of Ethanol does not go up after increasing its production because the data record shows that the amount will decrease by about 40%. And this will occur after an improvement in the production due to increasing the demands of the Ethanol Even though he admits the government is supporting to the Ethanol producers. Conversely, the author says the government costs a lot of money because of the Ethanol production and increment in the price will happen after the government stops that assistance.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
because it is using also produce the CO2, the greenhouse gas.
because its using also produces the CO2, the greenhouse gas.
the speaker discusses the Ethanol is not effecting
the speaker discusses the Ethanol which is not effecting
the speaker discusses that the Ethanol is not effecting
because of the Ethanol production and increment in the price will happen after the government stops that assistance.
because of the Ethanol production and increment in the price which will happen after the government stops that assistance.
because the Ethanol production and increment in the price will happen after the government stops that assistance.
----------------------
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
you always have issues on 'because' and 'because of'
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 293 250
No. of Characters: 1429 1200
No. of Different Words: 143 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.877 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.529 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.636 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.456 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.413 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.66 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.202 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upporting his debate. On the other hand, the professor counters these specific po...
^^
Line 4, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the government stops that assistance.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, if, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99317406143 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59538754895 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488054607509 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2267140397 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383137844662 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151306040953 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706529393886 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225315377972 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354531184437 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.