Tpo 22 integrated writing

The article stats that ethanol is not a good replacement to gasoline and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explain that the ethanol can be a good alternative for gasoline and refutes each of the author’s reasons.

First, the reading assert that ethanol can not solve the global warming. Ethanol release carbon dioxide when burning like gasoline and it cannot be caused to reduce global warming phenomena. the professor refutes this point by stating that using of ethanol can reduce the carbon dioxide due to panting more corn. He says that ethanol can be extract from corn or other plants and increasing in planting will reduce the carbon dioxide because the plants use carbon dioxide and operate as an filter in air.

Second, the article claims that using ethanol will lead to reduce animal food and available plant. Conversely, the lecture explains that for producing ethanol another alternative is cellulose. The cellulose is impossible for eating and it is useful to plant cellulous instead of plant that animal eating it. Therefore, using ethanol do not reduce the arability of animal food.

Finally, the author stats that ethanol never be able to compete with gasoline on price. In contrast, the professor explicates that ethanol able to compete with gasoline in terms of price due to a simple rule in producing and consuming. The lecture gives a support for ethanol pricing. The professor claims that if production of ethanol increase, the price will be reduce due to much consuming.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...sed to reduce global warming phenomena. the professor refutes this point by stating...
^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...lants use carbon dioxide and operate as an filter in air. Second, the article ...
^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be never
... Finally, the author stats that ethanol never be able to compete with gasoline on price....
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... increase, the price will be reduce due to much consuming.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14859437751 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51012048064 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489959839357 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2399247806 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5714285714 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477159849786 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192668109547 0.0996497079465 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380880635731 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297469214519 0.162205337803 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389031131861 0.0443174109184 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.