The passage states that ethanol fuel are not suitable alternative for gasoline and provides three reason of support. The professor, however, states that reason provided by the author are not compelling and refutes each of the author reason.
First, the article asserts that ethanol fuel does not help to subdue global warming problem. The professor refutes it by saying that it growing plants for ethanol fuel aids for reducing global warming problem. He claims that while growing plants for processing it as fuel, it takes carbon dioxide as nutrient from the atmosphere; thus, it helps in reduction of carbon dioxide.
Second, the passage posits that ethanol fuel may reduce the food and fodder of domestic animals. However, the professor argues that it will not cause any scarcity of food. According to professor, the ethanol fuel is made from cellulose part of plants, which are not eaten by animals. So, using only cellulose part for production will not affects on food resources.
Third, the article maintains that cost of ethanol will not be as cheaper as gasoline. The professor confutes it by explaining that huge production of it will reduce the per unit cost of gasoline. Further, we knew that it the production of ethanol is tripled of it's recent production, then the price will drop by 40 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... cellulose part for production will not affects on food resources. Third, the articl...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
... cellulose part for production will not affects on food resources. Third, the articl...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... cost of ethanol will not be as cheaper as gasoline. The professor confutes it by ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, then, third, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05963302752 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.472783423 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518348623853 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.077854048 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.9166666667 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405379267112 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146402648651 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698455934316 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220821886369 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044278337908 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.