Ethanol fuel produces by the aid of corn and sugar cane, this ethanol use for alternative gasoline. According to the article, replacement of the gasoline by the ethanol cause harmful impact on the environment, plummeting amount of plants and in future increase the price of ethanol. Whereas, in the lecture, the professor refute the reasons of the passage and says that it is inconsistent notions.
Firstly, the author claims that burned fuel causes the ethanol release the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leads to increase the greenhouse gas and instigate the global warming. In contrast, the lecturer mentions that ethanol produced from the corn. The corn plants do not release the carbon dioxide in the environment but plants absorb the carbon dioxide in the air, as result, it prevents the gas release on the environment when burned fuels.
Secondly, the passage implies that 60%corn used in ethanol production causes decrease the food for animals. On the other hand, the speaker explains that ethanol produced from the cellulose of the corn. Cellulose important part of the plants and animals does not eat this cellulose. Therefore, not decline the plants for animals.
Lastly, the article emphasizes that government provide the subsidies over 30 years if they not help then surging the ethanol price. On the contrary, the professor states that in future ethanol price not rising but decrease because of increase the used of the ethanol then, high production and ultimately price go down. In future 40 % price decrease and more than 3 times production of the ethanol.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1640625 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57927057108 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50390625 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9243733619 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516533844004 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187296814898 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118882549068 0.0662205650399 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308397502558 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697916814056 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.