TPO 23
The passage and lecture both discuss the population of yellow cedar. The passage points out that these tress have been declining, and the author provides three hypotheses to address this claim. However, the lecturer, holding critical view rails against what the author asserts.
First of all, it has been highlighted in the passage that since bark beetle in known to attack cedar trees, it is possible that they decrease yellow cedar. In contrast, the speaker explains the data from these trees shows that yellow cedar is killer for insects. So this decline would not be as a result of insect parasites. This directly contradicts what the reading indicates.
As the second hypothesis, the text contends that this decline caused by brown bear. According to reading, cedar bark contain sugar which brown bear like it. While not having been convinced, the speaker explains that there is no evidence to prove the existence of bear next to these trees. This was another part where experienced significantly contradicted the reading.
Finlay, the text claims that the variation of climate may be the cause. the author says that the patterns of climate including season to season and day to day have changed. On the other hand, the lecturer claims that since a lot of trees and other species are sensitive to climate changes, other plants should die. In addition, speaker figure out some other results to support that this is not what killing them.
In conclusion, taking into account all of these factors we note that the text and lecture are unlike.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tress' or 'these tresses'?
Suggestion: this tress; these tresses
...llow cedar. The passage points out that these tress have been declining, and the author pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... variation of climate may be the cause. the author says that the patterns of climat...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256944444444 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.180555555556 0.158904122519 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0486111111111 0.0723426182421 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0277777777778 0.0435111971325 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0208333333333 0.0277247811725 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128472222222 0.128828473217 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0625 0.0370669169778 169% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.37950721033 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.03125 0.0208969081088 150% => OK
Particles: 0.00694444444444 0.00154638098197 449% => OK
Determiners: 0.138888888889 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0104166666667 0.0158828679856 66% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0208333333333 0.0114777025283 182% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1552.0 1645.83664459 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 271.125827815 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01550387597 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372093023256 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.259689922481 0.287516216867 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.151162790698 0.187439937562 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0813953488372 0.113142543107 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37950721033 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 59.5911544144 53.8517498576 111% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.125 21.7502111507 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8697911969 49.3711431718 58% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 132.220823453 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 21.7502111507 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 42.0939922481 50.5018328374 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.95454545455 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.708845383458 0.549887131256 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103983161019 0.142949733639 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0685955575832 0.0787303798458 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.57125801104 0.631733273073 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176939338632 0.139662658121 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.288645654001 0.266732575781 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116327325454 0.103435571967 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.315581149996 0.414875509568 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0584986454236 0.0530846634433 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.448153554316 0.40443939384 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113555912535 0.0528353158467 215% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.