Apparently there has been a lot of debates about what the exact cause of the significant decrease of the population of cedar tree which is common in the northwestern North America. The lecturer avers that the exact cause of this decline are unknown, despite the three possible reasons made by the author of the article. He says that all these reasons are not adequate.
First, the professor that the cedar bark beetle can not be the cause of decline. He states that yellow cedar trees have a poisoning substance in their leaves and barks, and that make them resistant to insects` damages. Because of this the professor denies the reason provided in the reading about the evidence that cedar bark beetle attacks and kill yellow cedar trees.
Second, the lecturer points out that brown beers can not be the possible cause of the decline in yellow cedar trees population. He explains that these trees are not declined only the Northwestern of north west, but also in the Islands, where is no beers. Therefore, since yellow cedar trees declines with or without beer, the explanation made by the author of the reading is not accurate.
Finally, the professor puts forth the idea that there is another factor to be taken in consideration which is period of decline.He states that because the trees dyes in lower warm more than in upper cool, we should expect more decline in the cold weather, However, the decline is more significant in the high temperature. Thus, even though changes of climate may increase the yellow cedar trees sensitivity, it can not be the cause. This opposes the third reason provided by the author of the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...onsideration which is period of decline.He states that because the trees dyes in l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88928571429 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46385865865 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3075221977 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.083333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416791681927 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153890273685 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803286528799 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24970998228 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643406088066 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.