Reading and lecture is about the authentcity of blood vessels, red blood cells and
collagen matrix. Reading asserts that these evidences suggest te original tissue of
dinosaurs. While, lecture thinks that points made in reading are not cogent to come to that
conclusion, he gave following reasons for his opinion:
First, reading implies that when fossils of T rex were examined researchers found out
small branching hollow channels and they contain small organic substance. Therefore, reading evidenced
that might be remnants of old blood cells. In contrast, lecture suggests that organic matter in and moisture
in the bones might be due to bacterial reaction. As a consequence, he witnessed that there is no possibility for residual
blood vessels in the fossil.
Second, reading states that researchers also discovered spheres which is analogous to red blood cells.
In addition, they also examined iron in those fossil cells, so they thought that those cells are indeed red blood cells. In contrary, lecture thinks that those spheres might be just reddish cells because many primitive animals lack red blood cells. As a result, the argument about the red blood cells can not be true.
Third, reading claims that fossils contained collagen matrix in the leg bone, that solidify
the statement that might be remains of T rex bone. However, lecture argues this statement made in reading,
he affirms that collagen would remain active for about hundred years. In contradiction, these fossils were about 700 million
years old, that might not be collagen of T rex bone. Instead, professor put forth that scientists might have shed their skin
when analyzing the fossils in that region and that might be the possible source of collagen. Thus, professor casts doubt on the statement made in the lecture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... evidences suggest te original tissue of dinosaurs. While, lecture thinks that po...
^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n reading are not cogent to come to that conclusion, he gave following reasons fo...
^^^
Line 6, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rex were examined researchers found out small branching hollow channels and they...
^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... substance. Therefore, reading evidenced that might be remnants of old blood cell...
^^^
Line 15, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en matrix in the leg bone, that solidify the statement that might be remains of T...
^^^
Line 16, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e argues this statement made in reading, he affirms that collagen would remain ac...
^^^
Line 17, column 56, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... collagen would remain active for about hundred years. In contradiction, these fossils ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, while, in addition, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28865979381 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47511915943 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7723946052 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.09492273731 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416662675827 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149997590101 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855258861678 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137829086169 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774623496836 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.